FAQ: What about the Jews?

Q. You forgot to mention all the global elite are Zionists/Jews!

A. I don't see any value in obsessing over the religious trappings the global elite adorn their public appearance with. I am interested in what they are doing, and how to stop them. Whether they claim they are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, atheist, Satanist - they are still using these tactics (as countless tyrants have throughout history) to subvert and overthrow nations around the world - and the solution to stopping them is withdrawing all support we give daily to these corporations that fund their activities and form the foundation of their strength. And whether they are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, atheist, or Satanist, once we begin boycotting and replacing these immense power structures they've constructed, their ability to carry out their agenda with impunity will be diminished.

If they are human, regardless of race, religion, or political ideology, the Art of War & 36-Strategies apply. Superficial labels are a distraction, and in fact, by obsessing over their alleged ethnic, religious, or racial characteristics we simply open ourselves up to the vast array of political weaponry the elite have aimed at those doing so.

Additionally, I do have many friends who are truly Jewish, God-fearing, and decent human beings and I am tired of them suffering because of the misdeeds of disingenuous elitists carrying out crimes in their faith's name. I see no benefit of continuously linking God-fearing decent human beings who happen to be Jewish, to godless corporate-financier criminals who simply claim to be Jewish, by birth or by right but clearly not in practice.

I leave you with an analogy: It is night and someone breaks into your home intent on murdering you and robbing you of your possessions. He is wearing a ski mask. You have two choices - lift the mask and see who he is, what race, what possible clues there may be to his religious affiliations, or reach for your gun and defend yourself. Clearly, the latter option would be tactically proficient, while the former would most likely get yourself killed while mired in irrelevant minutia. The moral is, let's work at stopping bad people with pragmatic solutions - boycotts, getting organized locally, holding ourselves and others to higher standards, and becoming the masters of our destiny - instead of becoming mired in political, racial, or religious minutia.

FAQ: Why are Globalist Think-Tank Documents Public?

Q. Why are such research documents - Which Path to Persia? or "String of Pearls" - made public on the web? If these are in fact strategic and provide a view into the world of powers that run the show on our globe, why would they allow such "sensitive" information and "plans" to be made public for everyone to read?


Image: Despite producing the vast majority of rules, regulations, laws and policies that dictate the destiny of Western civilization, as well as drawing up plans for war, these corporate-funded, corporate-serving think-tanks are little known amongst the general public. Despite publishing much of their work on publicly accessible websites, most people will never know about it, let alone take the time to read it.

....

A. You can't keep global empire a secret - by necessity you need people to believe in your cause - even if you dress it up and spin it as something other than naked conquest. The global corporate-financier elite manage access to information by marketing different levels of it to different demographics. This has been done throughout all of history. The explanations provided to the aristocracy to keep them in line was more straight-forward and pragmatic than the absolute fantasies used to dupe and manipulate the common man.

It works in layers - papers like "Which Path to Persia?" being toward the top are aimed at people who believe in global governance and globalization - professors, senior editors, CEOs etc. who falsely believe they have a stake in the process - and while it is made public, it is generally inaccessible to the average reader because of its use of academic English, length, and very high minimum requirements in understanding the history, strategy, geopolitics, and human nature necessary to understand the contents.

On Brookings' own website you will also see their policy makers pen articles and op-eds for newspapers, sufficiently dumbed-down, in plainer English, and with noticeably more spin in place of the straight-forward frankness of pieces like "Which Path to Persia?" Consider Kenneth Pollack, co-author of "Which Path to Persia?," then penning this fluff piece, "Iran's Covert War Against the US" for the Daily Beast.

Below that is your corporate-media propaganda which is almost entirely useless and also the most widely viewed by the greatest number of people. Those that believe anything they see on CNN or Fox are generally unaware that organizations like Brookings even exist - despite their "experts" often being brought on for commentary and analysis.

As much as the alternative media has grown, a tremendous amount of ordinary people have still never heard of PNAC, Agenda 21, Brookings (let alone any specific work of theirs) and so on. Also keep in mind that "Which Path to Persia?" while being incredibly frank and incriminating, is not necessarily the pinnacle manifestation of their conspiracy which most likely would not be "public." However, human nature being what it is - we can take what they do make known, and what human history has already taught us and extrapolate what indeed they are really up to and why.

I am acutely aware of a possible strategy of tension created by dictating the tempo and nature of global conflict by publicly releasing apparent intentions - then again the global elite of Wall Street and London really are subverting governments with US/UK funded NGOs and there is a paper trail overtly, publicly proving it. Since these NGOs are defended publicly as doing "humanitarian" work when targeted governments crackdown on them, they must show where their funding comes from and appear, at least to the ignorant, as legitimate. Despite both governments -the aggressor and the besieged - knowing the truth, the fact that so many gullible people don't understand that the "National Endowment for Democracy" is actually a corporate fascist front, tips the balance of power in favor of the greater propagandist - Wall Street/London.

Of course, the only thing we can ever be sure of is ourselves, our family and friends, and people in our immediate community. That is why facing the vast landscape of geopolitics and a means of implementing change across it is better off being started in your own backyard, on your own block, and in your own community. It is easy to identify those in society who have acquired unwarranted influence, and just as easy in many cases to immediately begin boycotting and replacing them with local solutions.